Demand · Recruiting and ATS
Who is asking for a recruiting tool on X
Hiring tooling gets discussed the week a role opens, and the window closes when the role is filled.
What people are posting right now
These are real public posts on X, found by scanning for the phrasings below. Each one is somebody describing the problem in their own words — not a mention of a brand name.
-
i see a lot of founders here using ashby for ATS ! any reason for it ? seems kinda expansive for me in this day and age. would you use a cheaper alternative ? and also agent support day 1 , testing the waters would love a feedback from someone here !
asking for a recommendation Founder explicitly shopping a cheaper ATS than Ashby and asking peers for alternatives.
-
Thank You! It's absolutely horrible out there right now. I'm extremely active on LinkedIn, and see this same thing over and over again. It's gotten to the point, I've created my own applicant tracking system in Google Sheets that does a lot of one-click tracking.
frustrated with the current tool Built a Sheets ATS because Greenhouse/Workday-style apply flows hide recruiters; classic small-team workaround.
-
Yes, we only hire bar raisers. It takes a lot of time and patience but when you find the right people it makes a world of difference. On the ATS front there’s nothing horribly complicated… it’s an ATS. There’s simply no reason to pay as much as we were for software that can be generated specifically to our needs.
leaving a competitor CTO saying they overpaid for generic ATS and would rather something simpler/custom.
-
This is not part of LinkedIn premium, only LinkedIn Recruiter which is much more expensive. While that is great, most companies do not give hiring managers a recruiter seat (mine did and hence I got to know)
frustrated with the current tool Hiring manager calling out Recruiter seat cost and access gap vs Premium.
-
Looking to hire a mini-me 🥹 Someone to support me across a bunch of recruiting projects. Sourcing, talent mapping, candidate outreach, scheduling, and all the admin that somehow multiplies overnight. Fully remote, Initial 3-month contract and Flexible hours. DM me if interested
hiring for the problem Recruiter drowning in scheduling/notes/admin—the exact ops a light ATS is meant to absorb.
-
Can confirm: we're seeing a SaaSpocalypse in our company. In the past two months, we've essentially rebuilt Mixpanel, Airtable, Cowork, and Jira, plus our own hiring platform. Slack and Notion are next.
leaving a competitor CEO ripping out SaaS and rebuilding a hiring platform—pain with generic tools, high intent to own pipeline.
-
@LinkedIn @LinkedInHelp pretty sure my account has been rate limited. We’re on a company plan, with 100 seats on LinkedIn Recruiter. Need it to work in order to function in my job. Please help
frustrated with the current tool Operator dependent on a large Recruiter contract that’s failing; venue pain, not a rec-ask.
-
Every AI hiring tool demo looks the same. Clean dashboard. Impressive scores. A number next to every candidate. Then you buy it and your team does the same work, plus maintains a new tool. A buyer's guide for 2026.
frustrated with the current tool Names the buyer fear: new ATS/AI layer that doesn’t replace the spreadsheet work.
-
like 99% of current hiring insanity is because of this. there’s basically no way to actually sift through the insane number of applicants jobs are getting so companies make you jump through a bunch of random hoops just to narrow the field enough to examine who’s left
frustrated with the current tool Volume/sifting pain that small teams feel when Greenhouse-style funnels overflow.
-
Greenhouse's CEO just named it: the AI doom loop. Candidates blast AI-written applications everywhere, recruiters use AI to filter the flood, rejected candidates escalate with more. 254 avg applicants/posting, +412% per recruiter since 2023. More filtering won't end this.
comparing two options Recruiter-side discussion of Greenhouse volume; adjacent to needing a usable pipeline, not more enterprise filters.
Posts are public and linked to their author. This page is refreshed monthly, so anything deleted at the source drops off at the next refresh.
What demand looks like in Recruiting and ATS
Strictly time-boxed intent. A reply two weeks late is worthless here in a way it is not in other categories.
Demand on X is less “recommend a SaaS this week” and more operators saying enterprise ATS and LinkedIn Recruiter seats are overkill or broken, while they still run hiring from Sheets, Notion, or a homegrown tracker. Founders are comparing Ashby/Greenhouse/Lever on price and asking for cheaper, agent-ready tools; recruiters complain about application floods and scheduling admin. Job-seeker ATS-optimization noise is loud, but the buyer-shaped posts are about cost, spreadsheet workarounds, and skipping enterprise onboarding.
The phrases buyers actually type
Searching your category name returns vendor marketing. Searching the sentences below returns people. These are the ones that work in Recruiting and ATS:
ATS for a small teamGreenhouse alternativeLinkedIn Recruiter is expensivehow are you tracking candidateshiring tool recommendationsspreadsheet for hiring
Combine them with -filter:retweets and a recent date window. The full method is in the guide to finding buyers on X.
What they are leaving
Buyers in this category are usually moving away from something specific: Greenhouse, Lever, LinkedIn Recruiter, a spreadsheet. Naming the tool they are leaving is the fastest way to find switchers, because they almost always write it down.
Who buys
Founders, hiring managers, recruiters, operations. If a post comes from a brand account, a newsletter or an aggregator rather than one of those, it is a mention and not a buyer — the difference matters more than it sounds.
See this for your own product
This page is one scan. Askline runs the same thing on your offer, scores who is actually in the market, and drafts a reply you approve before it goes out.
Start freeOther categories
- Who is asking for a CRM on X
- Who is asking for invoicing software on X
- Who is asking for an email marketing tool on X
- Who is asking for a project management tool on X
- Who is asking for a customer support tool on X
- Who is asking for a product analytics tool on X
- Who is asking for developer tools on X
- Who is asking for error monitoring on X